ĐỀ 26/11/2011
The economic development brings a better life to people, but
only people in developing countries do feel happier while those in developed
one are less. Why is this and state your view
AGREE
-
-More jobs in haves nations are
delivered to those in haves not nations to make use of low-priced labor and
redundant natural resources
-
- That pollution and terrorism are on
a climb in the world endanger people in rich areas
DISAGREE
-
- Rising flexibility in the world
market
-
- Competition in rich nations’ work
environment and worker’s satisfaction in poor ones
-
- Lower crime-rates in poor nations
and a decrease in illegal immigration to rich ones
-
- Since the 1970s onwards, there have
been fewer conflicts and wars
-
- Being richer, people invest much
more in education, environment protection, health-care …
The world is becoming richer with
people having higher salaries and more comfortable facilities. Some people
believe that this trend is conducive to people’s growing happiness in both
developing and developed regions while others subscribe to the notion that
apparently it sounds so, but more pains are now seen in those in the latter
areas. I strongly disagree with the latter view for some reasons.
Admittedly,
the living standards of people, according to studies, are escalating by dint of
economic growth. People in developing world are able
to afford such facilities from cars, houses to overseas travel, enriching their
life experience and providing them with more opportunities, but those in
another pole of the world, say, the wealthy nations, are different, feeling
less happy. It is believed that as a result of the expansion of outsourcing
market, more jobs in haves nations are directly stolen and delivered to those
in haves not nations to make use of low-priced labor and redundant natural
resources. However, I hold
an opposite view on this matter. Taking a closer look into the picture
of outsourcing, we can see more advantages for both sides. This trend, after
all, is inevitable, showing rising flexibility in the work market where winners
are the most efficient and available while losers are less adaptable to the
changing world. To further
counter, another argument is that facing the threat of being deprived of
current jobs, workers in more developed areas are competitively working harder
and training them better with advanced jobs while those in the third-world are
satisfied to have chance of employment, leading to the latter’s lower
crime-rates and illegal immigration into the western countries for sake of job-
finding.
That
pollution and terrorism are on a climb in the world is believed to present a
threat to all people as well. Despite
their richest, those in developed nations still feel annoyed for not genuinely
enjoying a sustainable globe. Not only do tsunami and other natural disasters
which often happen in less developed regions can have far- reaching effects on
rich ones, but the existence of a wider network of terrorists actually also
puts their lives in jeopardy. A typical example is the case of New York’s nine
eleven event, and until now, pains are noticeably seen in the face of people
here, in spite of their pride to reside in one of the most prosperous harbors
of the world. Nevertheless,
the truth is that since the 1970s onwards, there have been fewer conflicts and
wars. Such terrorism actions can hardly cost as many deaths as those massacres
in the First and Second World Wars, statistically. Besides, as the health-care of each nation
is increasingly addressed, by dint of economic growth and the provision of
cutting-edge technology, more lives in both poles are saved and diseases are
in-time curbed. Also, the wealthier people are, the more they can invest in
education to have better awareness of environmental protection and the more
willing they are to use environment-friendly products, again by virtue of
innovative technological applications. Psychologically, once the financial matter is less
urgent as it used to be, long-term thinking and strategies are adopted by
people in both poles of the world.
In my view, all above figures really
indicate that the world is changing for the better, and the most crucial is
that each person, whether living anywhere, should nourish the belief to protect
the earth home everyday to live happily ever after.
-
Notion (n) : quan điểm, khái niệm =
conception
Subscribe to the notion (v) : đồng ý với quan điểm
-
Apparent (adj) hiển nhiên, rõ ràng =
evident (adj)
-
Redundant (adj) : dư thừa – (n)
redundancy
-
Illegal (adj) bất hợp pháp, trái
luật
-
Terrorism
/'terərizm/ (n) : chính sách khủng bố
-
Sustainable
(adj) có thể chịu đựng được, có thể chứng minh được
-
Genuine
(adj) chân thật, thành thật
-
Afford
(v) : đủ sức, đủ điều kiện, đủ khả năng mua sắm
-
Outsourcing
(n) : sự gia công
-
Inevitable
(adj) : chắc chắn xảy ra, không thể tránh được
-
Tsunami
(n) sóng thần
-
Far-reaching
(adj) : ảnh hưởng rộng rãi, sâu rộng
-
Jeopardy
(n) sự nguy hiểm = danger = hazard = peril
-
Prosperous
(adj) thịnh vượng, phát đạt, thành công = thriving (adj)
prosper
(v) = thrive (v) = florish (v)
-
Massacre
(v) tiêu diệt, tàn sát
-
Nourish
(v) nuôi dưỡng, ấp ủ
-
Since
the 1970s onward : từ thập niên 70 trở đi
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét